Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a wider range of input modalities, while Claude Opus 4.7 emphasizes text-focused operations with ethical reasoning.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google's latest frontier model with expanded reasoning.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's heavyweight for hard reasoning and agentic work.
Specs
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.0M tokens↑ | 1M tokens |
| Input $/1M tokens | $2.00↑ | $5.00 |
| Output $/1M tokens | $12.00↑ | $25.00 |
| Modalities | Audio · File · Image · Text · Video | Text · Image |
| Open weights | No | No |
How they differ
Input modalities
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports text, image, audio, file, and video inputs.
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 supports text and image inputs.
Context handling
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 1,048,576 tokens of context, slightly more than Claude, accommodating broader input scope.
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 allows up to 1,000,000 tokens of context, favoring extensive text-based discussions.
Cost profile
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro operates at $2.0/1M input tokens and $12.0/1M output tokens, offering lower overall expenses.
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 charges $5.0/1M input tokens and $25.0/1M output tokens, resulting in higher operational costs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro — what sets it apart
- +Supports multimodal inputs, including audio, file, and video.
- +Offers a more cost-efficient pricing structure that aids in scaling.
Claude Opus 4.7 — what sets it apart
- +Focuses on text and image inputs exclusively.
- +Designed with a strong emphasis on ethical reasoning and human alignment.
The most consequential difference lies in the broader modality support and cost efficiency of Gemini 3.1 Pro compared to the text-centric design and ethical emphasis of Claude Opus 4.7.
Analysis synthesized from gpt-4o, llama-4-maverick, phi-4, etc.